The ban on fur farming requires a fair compensation mechanism, says Sandra Vilciņa, Executive Director of the Animal Breeders Association of Latvia (LZA).
She explains this approach is employed in other European Union (EU) member states that have adopted similar bans. The compensation model would need to recognise investments and commitments of the fur industry on the basis of the pre-existing industry framework to ensure that those affected by this transition are not put in a difficult situation.
Representatives of the association mention that the ruling of the Constitutional Court to ban fur farming in Latvia was declared compliant with the Constitution will have a significant impact on the mink fur farming sector and does not reflect the complex nature of the sector and the wider consequences for the Latvian agricultural sector.
The association mentions that the option to turn to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and European Commission (EC) over this issue is considered. Mink fur farmers want a fair review of the case, because they believe their interests and rights are protected by European regulations.
LZA representatives explain the court’s arguments in regards to the legislative process are dubious,
lack transparency and industry’s data analysis, as well as assessment of economic influence. As a result, the court made the decision that does not provide conditions of equal competition.
Representatives of the association object to the five-year transition period, saying that it does not take into account the cyclic nature of the industry, causing significant losses.
LZA representatives also say that the ruling establishes a three-year transitional period at the expense of fur farmers, which is insufficient to terminate the industry in an orderly and equitable manner. This shortened deadline does not take into account the complexity of the operation of the industry and the significant investments made on the basis of the regulatory framework.
Representatives of the association note that the industry is committed to following ethical and sustainable agricultural practices and is prepared to engage in constructive discussions with all sides to find practical solutions.
As previously reported, on the 11th of April, the Constitutional Court announced that the section of the law that provides for banning fur farming in Latvia in the future complies with the country’s constitution.
Also read: Two men arrested in Germany for allegedly spying on behalf of Russia
Follow us on Facebook and X!