Harijs Rokpelnis, head of the Saeima faction of the Union of Greens and Farmers (ZZS), has expressed a negative stance toward the proposal to introduce paid leave for women during menstruation.
Commenting on the more than 10 000 signatures collected on the public initiative platform Manabalss.lv in support of two paid menstrual leave days, Rokpelnis told the LETA news agency that he views the initiative negatively.
He emphasized that residents already have access to multiple types of leave, and that clear procedures are in place to take sick leave in such situations.
“There is no need to introduce additional regulation,” Rokpelnis stated.
Previously, Agnese Krasta, deputy chair of the New Unity (JV) Saeima faction, also told LETA that she views the proposal with caution.
“At this stage, I remain cautious toward the initiative, as it’s important to consider its budgetary impact and assess socio-economic factors—such as whether this approach might reduce women’s competitiveness in the job market or pose risks of discrimination,” Krasta explained.
As previously reported, the initiative’s author Marija Uškanova is seeking amendments to Latvia’s Labour Law that would grant women the right to up to two paid days off during menstruation. According to Uškanova, this would improve women’s health, well-being, and work environment, while also helping to reduce stigma surrounding menstruation. The initiative aims to create a more understanding and fair approach toward women in the workplace, following examples already implemented in countries such as Spain and Japan.
These days off would be optional and at the discretion of the employee, ensuring privacy and simplifying the process. Employers would be required to provide these days off while maintaining average pay, similar to sick leave. Uškanova suggests that these absences could be recorded in the working hours system under a special note—“menstrual leave.” She argues that such systems are already in place in other countries and could be adapted to Latvia’s legal framework without placing an excessive burden on administrative resources.
The author of the initiative believes that this would allow women to recover physically and emotionally during menstruation, reducing the need for painkillers or the pressure to work while unwell. It would also help women feel valued and understood, increasing loyalty, productivity, and a positive attitude toward employers. Furthermore, it could reduce burnout and stress, as taking timely rest could prevent long-term health issues and mental exhaustion.
Lastly, Uškanova stresses that this would help combat stigma—promoting greater societal openness and understanding of the biological aspects of the female cycle, and helping to reduce taboos and stereotypes surrounding menstruation.